Skip to content

Fast-Dissolving Oral Film of Ondansetron for Paediatric Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea: 3² Factorial Optimisation

  • 12 slides
  • 16 viva questions
  • 6 modules
  • No code needed

@ondansetron-fast-dissolving-oral-film-3-2-factorial-paediatricUpdated Oct 2026

Solvent-cast HPMC films, polymer and plasticiser as factors, disintegration, strength and two-minute release as responses, optimised in Design-Expert.

M.Pharm, Pharmaceutics · Sem 4 · Advanced · 26 weeks · Solo

More info
Level
Advanced · 26 weeks · Solo
Relevant for
All India
Common at
PCI (M.Pharm 2014 scheme), Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences
Syllabus
PCI 2014 semester scheme · MPH 402P / MPH 403P Research Work / Colloquium + Final Presentation · Semester 4
Tech stack
  • Solvent casting (film applicator / glass moulds, hot-air oven)
  • Design-Expert (3² full factorial, ANOVA, desirability optimisation)
  • UV-visible spectrophotometry (assay, dissolution)
  • FTIR and DSC (drug-excipient compatibility)
  • USP type II dissolution apparatus, petri-dish disintegration method
  • Texture analyser or fabricated tensile tester; digital micrometer
  • Stability chamber per ICH Q1A(R2); GraphPad Prism
For educational purposes only

Unlock this project

Full PPT + speaker notes, the step-by-step method, READMEFIRST, instructions and all 16 viva answers.

One-time. No subscription, no auto-renew, no drama.

Project packs

Credits never expire and work on any project. Use one here, save the rest for your friend who “will pay you back”.

  1. Pinned

    1 min

    Overview

    Children receiving chemotherapy often struggle with nausea and vomiting, and the medicine meant to help can itself be hard to give. Swallowing a tablet while nauseated is difficult for a young child, syrups need accurate measurement, and orally disintegrating tablets can be gritty and fragile. Ondansetron, a 5-HT₃ receptor antagonist, is widely used for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in children. A fast-dissolving oral film that sits on the tongue and disintegrates within seconds without water could make dosing easier for caregivers in paediatric oncology wards and at home.

    This M.Pharm dissertation develops a 4 mg ondansetron oral film by solvent casting, using HPMC as film former, PEG 400 as plasticiser, a sweetener and saliva stimulant for palatability, and no ingredients considered unsuitable for young children. After preformulation and compatibility studies (FTIR, DSC), formulation is optimised by a 3² full factorial design in Design-Expert: polymer concentration and plasticiser level are the factors; disintegration time, tensile strength (with folding endurance) and percentage drug released at 2 minutes are the responses.

    The optimised film is validated against model predictions, characterised for thickness, weight and content uniformity, surface pH, mechanical properties and morphology, and placed on accelerated stability as per ICH Q1A(R2). The work is written for the PCI M.Pharm Pharmaceutics research scheme (Semester 3 research work and Semester 4 MPH 402P / MPH 403P).

    Syllabus alignment

    PCI · 2014 semester scheme

    MPH 402P / MPH 403P · Research Work / Colloquium + Final Presentation · Semester 4 · 19 credits · dissertation 500 (objectives 50, methodology 150, results & discussion 250, conclusions 50) + presentation 250 (100 + 50 + Q&A 100)

    Subjects this project applies
    • MPH 102T Drug Delivery Systems
    • MPH 103T Modern Pharmaceutics (optimisation techniques)
    • MPH 101T Modern Pharmaceutical Analytical Techniques
    • MPH 104T Regulatory Affairs (stability, ICH)
    • MRM 301T Research Methodology and Biostatistics
    How it is evaluated

    dissertation ≥ 75 typed pages, bound, quadruplicate; chapters: Introduction, Aims/Objectives, Review, Materials & Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, Summary, References, Annexures; RGUHS: synopsis within 9 months of admission, dissertation ≥ 2 months before exam

    1 min read · 16 viva questions

  2. 2 min

    Synopsis

    Abstract

    Fast-dissolving oral films of ondansetron (4 mg) were developed by solvent casting for paediatric chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Following preformulation and drug-excipient compatibility studies, a 3² full factorial design evaluated the effects of HPMC concentration and PEG 400 level on disintegration time, tensile strength and drug release at 2 minutes. Polynomial models were fitted and an optimised formulation was selected by desirability and validated experimentally. The optimised film was characterised and subjected to accelerated stability studies as per ICH guidelines.

    Introduction

    Oral thin films dissolve or disintegrate quickly on the tongue, release drug into saliva and are swallowed without water. They suit patients who have difficulty swallowing, including children and patients with nausea. Regulatory guidance on paediatric medicines emphasises age-appropriate dosage forms, acceptable taste and safe excipients. Ondansetron is a suitable candidate because of its low dose and widespread paediatric use for CINV.

    Literature gap

    Published ondansetron film studies often use one-factor-at-a-time trials or optimise only disintegration. Fewer apply a factorial design that balances fast disintegration against mechanical strength, which is the central trade-off for films that must survive handling by caregivers. Few studies explicitly design for paediatric use (dose size, excipient choice, film size) or report check-point validation and stability.

    Hypothesis

    Increasing HPMC concentration increases tensile strength but slows disintegration and early release; increasing PEG 400 improves flexibility and may speed disintegration up to a point. An optimum exists that meets all three response targets.

    Feasibility

    • Technical: solvent casting needs simple equipment; Design-Expert is named in the PCI syllabus; UV, FTIR, DSC and dissolution apparatus are standard in pharmaceutics departments.
    • Economic: ondansetron and excipients can be obtained as gift samples or at modest cost.
    • Ethical: in-vitro study only; no human taste panel or animal study, so no ethics committee approval is required.
  3. 1 min

    Problem statement

    Children undergoing chemotherapy need reliable antiemetic dosing, but tablets are hard to swallow during nausea, liquids require careful measurement and orally disintegrating tablets are brittle. A fast-dissolving film offers accurate unit dosing without water, but film formulation involves a trade-off: films that disintegrate fastest are often weak and tear when peeled from packaging, while strong films disintegrate slowly. Formulation decisions made by trial and error do not reveal how polymer and plasticiser levels interact. The problem addressed is to develop and optimise a paediatric-appropriate fast-dissolving oral film of ondansetron using a 3² factorial design that balances rapid disintegration and early drug release with adequate mechanical strength, and to confirm its stability.

  4. 1 min

    Objectives & scope

    1. 01To carry out preformulation studies of ondansetron, including solubility, λmax determination and analytical method validation.
    2. 02To establish drug-excipient compatibility using FTIR and DSC.
    3. 03To screen film formers and plasticisers by preliminary trials and select levels for the factorial design.
    4. 04To prepare nine formulations by a 3² full factorial design and evaluate disintegration, tensile strength, folding endurance and drug release.
    5. 05To fit and validate polynomial models and select an optimised formulation by desirability.
    6. 06To characterise the optimised film and evaluate its stability under ICH accelerated conditions.

    Scope

    The study covers in-vitro development of a 4 mg ondansetron oral film for paediatric use, from preformulation to accelerated stability. It does not include in-vivo pharmacokinetic studies, human taste panels or clinical evaluation, which require ethics approval and are listed as future work. Taste masking is addressed through excipient choice and evaluated in vitro only.

  5. 2 min

    Methodology

    Research design

    Experimental formulation development using Quality by Design principles and a 3² full factorial design, followed by validation and stability testing.

    Semester 3 — research work and proposal

    1. Literature and proposal: review of oral films, ondansetron and paediatric formulation guidance; synopsis and proposal presentation (MRM 301T foundations).
    2. Preformulation: organoleptic properties, melting point, solubility in water and phosphate buffer pH 6.8, λmax determination by UV scan, calibration curve, method validation (linearity, precision, accuracy, LOD/LOQ) per ICH Q2.
    3. Compatibility: FTIR of drug, excipients and physical mixtures; DSC thermograms.
    4. Preliminary trials: HPMC E5, HPMC E15, pullulan and PVA as film formers; PEG 400 and glycerol as plasticisers; select system based on film appearance, peelability and disintegration.
    5. Quality target product profile (QTPP) and critical quality attributes (CQAs): film size about 2 × 3 cm, 4 mg ondansetron base per film, disintegration < 30 s, adequate tensile strength and folding endurance, rapid release.

    Semester 4 — factorial design and evaluation (MPH 402P)

    Factors and levels

    Factor−10+1
    X1: HPMC concentration (% w/v of casting solution)lowmiddlehigh
    X2: PEG 400 (% w/w of polymer)lowmiddlehigh
    Levels are fixed from the preliminary trials.

    Responses: Y1 disintegration time (s, petri-dish method in simulated saliva pH 6.8); Y2 tensile strength (MPa) with folding endurance as a supporting response; Y3 % drug released at 2 min (USP type II, simulated saliva pH 6.8, 37 °C).

    Other evaluations for all nine batches: weight and thickness variation, surface pH, content uniformity, percentage elongation, moisture uptake.

    Analysis in Design-Expert: fit linear, two-factor interaction or quadratic models; ANOVA (model p < 0.05, non-significant lack of fit, adjusted and predicted R² agreement); contour and 3D response-surface plots; numerical optimisation with desirability (minimise Y1, maximise Y3, Y2 in range); prepare the optimised batch in triplicate and compute % prediction error.

    Optimised film characterisation: SEM or optical microscopy of surface, dissolution profile with similarity to a marketed orally disintegrating tablet (f2), release kinetics.

    Stability: optimised films in aluminium pouches at 40 ± 2 °C / 75 ± 5% RH and 25 ± 2 °C / 60 ± 5% RH for at least 3 months; test appearance, content, disintegration and dissolution at 0, 1, 2 and 3 months.

    Statistics

    Mean ± SD (n = 3 or 6); ANOVA in Design-Expert; one-way ANOVA or t-tests in GraphPad Prism for stability data; α = 0.05.

    Timeline (26 weeks)

    WeeksActivity
    1–6Literature, proposal, preformulation, method validation
    7–9Compatibility and preliminary trials
    10–15Factorial batches and evaluation
    16–17Optimisation and validation
    18–24Stability (runs in parallel with writing)
    25–26Dissertation, colloquium, final presentation
  6. 1 min

    Architecture & tech stack

    • Solvent casting (film applicator / glass moulds, hot-air oven)
    • Design-Expert (3² full factorial, ANOVA, desirability optimisation)
    • UV-visible spectrophotometry (assay, dissolution)
    • FTIR and DSC (drug-excipient compatibility)
    • USP type II dissolution apparatus, petri-dish disintegration method
    • Texture analyser or fabricated tensile tester; digital micrometer
    • Stability chamber per ICH Q1A(R2); GraphPad Prism

    The study follows a Quality by Design workflow: define the target, identify the critical factors, map the design space with a factorial experiment, then confirm and test stability.

    flowchart TD
      A["QTPP: 4 mg paediatric film, disintegration under 30 s"] --> B["Preformulation: solubility, lambda max, method validation"]
      B --> C["Compatibility: FTIR, DSC"]
      C --> D["Preliminary trials: film formers and plasticisers"]
      D --> E["Select factors: HPMC concentration X1, PEG 400 X2"]
      E --> F["3x3 full factorial: 9 batches"]
      F --> G["Responses: disintegration, tensile strength, release at 2 min"]
      G --> H["Design-Expert: model fitting, ANOVA, response surfaces"]
      H --> I["Desirability optimisation"]
      I --> J["Check-point batch: prediction error"]
      J --> K["Characterisation: SEM, dissolution, kinetics"]
      K --> L["ICH accelerated stability, 3 months"]
      L --> M["Conclusions and future in-vivo work"]

    Why these factors

    Polymer concentration controls film thickness, viscosity of the casting solution and the strength of the polymer network, which drives both tensile strength and disintegration. Plasticiser level controls flexibility and brittleness and changes how quickly water penetrates the film. Their interaction is expected to be significant, which a one-factor-at-a-time approach would miss.

    Paediatric design choices

    Film size small enough for a child's tongue, a single 4 mg unit dose to avoid cutting, a sweetener and saliva stimulant for palatability, and avoidance of excipients that paediatric development guidance flags for caution in young children. The report includes a table justifying each excipient against that guidance.

  7. 6 modules

    Modules

    • Chapter 1 — Introduction

      CINV in paediatric oncology, ondansetron pharmacology, oral thin films as dosage forms, paediatric formulation considerations and the rationale for the study.

    • Chapter 2 — Aim, objectives and plan of work

      Aim, specific objectives, QTPP and CQAs, hypothesis and a Gantt-style plan of work across Semester 3 and Semester 4.

    • Chapter 3 — Review of literature

      Film formers and plasticisers, solvent casting, evaluation methods, factorial designs in formulation development, published ondansetron fast-dissolving products, and drug profile and excipient profiles.

    • Chapter 4 — Materials and methods

      Materials with sources, preformulation, analytical method validation, compatibility studies, preliminary trials, factorial design layout, evaluation methods, optimisation procedure and stability protocol.

    • Chapters 5–8 — Results, discussion, conclusion and summary

      Preformulation and compatibility results, factorial data, ANOVA tables, response-surface plots, optimised formulation and validation, characterisation, stability data, discussion against literature, conclusion and summary.

    • References and annexures

      References in the department's style, certificates of analysis or gift-sample letters, raw data sheets, Design-Expert reports, spectra and thermograms.

  8. Locked

    Presentation

    12 slides with speaker notes. The outline below is free; the bullets, notes and the generated .pptx unlock with the project.

    1. Ondansetron Fast-Dissolving Oral Film for Children
    2. Need for the study
    3. Aim, QTPP and CQAs
    4. Preformulation and method validation
    5. Compatibility
    6. Preliminary trials
    7. 3² factorial design
    8. Model fitting and ANOVA
    9. Response surfaces and optimisation
    10. Validation and characterisation
    11. Stability
    12. Conclusion and future work

    Bullets, speaker notes and the .pptx download unlock with the project.

    Presentation is locked: 12 slides, Speaker notes, .pptx download.

  9. Locked

    How to run

    A research, analysis or design project, so there's no code bundle: 9 steps to carry it out with Solvent casting (film applicator / glass moulds, hot-air oven), Design-Expert (3² full factorial, ANOVA, desirability optimisation) and UV-visible spectrophotometry (assay, dissolution).

    The good part is behind this lock. Like every good viva answer.

    How to run is locked: 9 steps.

  10. 1 min

    Future scope

    Taste-masking could be improved with ion-exchange resins or cyclodextrin complexes and assessed with an electronic tongue. An in-vivo pharmacokinetic study in animals, and later an acceptability study in children with ethics approval, would establish clinical value. Scale-up on a continuous film-casting line and packaging studies in child-resistant pouches would move the formulation toward industrial relevance.

  11. 8 sources

    References

    1. Pharmacy Council of India — M.Pharm syllabus (2014 scheme)
    2. ICH Q8(R2) Pharmaceutical Development
    3. ICH Q1A(R2) Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products
    4. ICH Q2(R1) Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology
    5. European Medicines Agency — Guideline on Pharmaceutical Development of Medicines for Paediatric Use (2013)
    6. Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission — Indian Pharmacopoeia (ondansetron monographs)
    7. Douglas C. Montgomery — Design and Analysis of Experiments, Wiley
    8. Leon Lachman, Herbert A. Lieberman and Joseph L. Kanig — The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy, CBS Publishers

    Cite this bundle

    OnlyProjects. (2026). Fast-Dissolving Oral Film of Ondansetron for Paediatric Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea: 3² Factorial Optimisation: M.Pharm Pharmaceutics project bundle [Educational resource]. https://onlyprojects.online/projects/mpharm-pharmaceutics-ondansetron-fast-dissolving-oral-film-3-2-factorial-paediatric

Slides, diagrams & files

12 slides. Titles are free; bullets, speaker notes and the .pptx unlock with the project.

  1. SLIDE 1

    Ondansetron Fast-Dissolving Oral Film for Children

  2. SLIDE 2

    Need for the study

  3. SLIDE 3

    Aim, QTPP and CQAs

  4. SLIDE 4

    Preformulation and method validation

  5. SLIDE 5

    Compatibility

  6. SLIDE 6

    Preliminary trials

  7. SLIDE 7

    3² factorial design

  8. SLIDE 8

    Model fitting and ANOVA

  9. SLIDE 9

    Response surfaces and optimisation

  10. SLIDE 10

    Validation and characterisation

  11. SLIDE 11

    Stability

  12. SLIDE 12

    Conclusion and future work

Architecture diagram

1
flowchart TD
  A["QTPP: 4 mg paediatric film, disintegration under 30 s"] --> B["Preformulation: solubility, lambda max, method validation"]
  B --> C["Compatibility: FTIR, DSC"]
  C --> D["Preliminary trials: film formers and plasticisers"]
  D --> E["Select factors: HPMC concentration X1, PEG 400 X2"]
  E --> F["3x3 full factorial: 9 batches"]
  F --> G["Responses: disintegration, tensile strength, release at 2 min"]
  G --> H["Design-Expert: model fitting, ANOVA, response surfaces"]
  H --> I["Desirability optimisation"]
  I --> J["Check-point batch: prediction error"]
  J --> K["Characterisation: SEM, dissolution, kinetics"]
  K --> L["ICH accelerated stability, 3 months"]
  L --> M["Conclusions and future in-vivo work"]

Files

Viva questions & answers

3 of 16 questions free. Explain each answer in your own words before you move on.

  1. Concept

    How does ondansetron prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea?

    Ondansetron blocks 5-HT₃ receptors on vagal afferent nerves in the gut and in the chemoreceptor trigger zone. Chemotherapy releases serotonin from enterochromaffin cells, which activates these receptors and triggers vomiting; blocking them reduces acute nausea and vomiting.

  2. Concept

    What is a fast-dissolving oral film?

    It is a thin, flexible polymer strip containing drug that hydrates and disintegrates on the tongue within seconds, releasing drug into saliva to be swallowed without water. It suits children and nauseated patients and provides an accurate unit dose.

  3. Concept

    What are QTPP and CQAs?

    The quality target product profile describes the intended product, such as dose, dosage form, patient group and performance. Critical quality attributes are measurable properties, such as disintegration time and content uniformity, that must be controlled to achieve that profile.

+13 more questions

They and the answers unlock with the project. Try answering the ones above yourself first. Your examiner will.

For educational purposes only. Use this bundle to understand how the project works, then build and write your own. Submitting it verbatim is between you, your conscience and your external examiner.