Pinned
@polyherbal-anti-acne-gel-formulation-evaluation
1 min
Overview
This project develops and evaluates a polyherbal anti-acne gel that combines standardised ethanolic extracts of neem (Azadirachta indica) leaf and tulsi (Ocimum sanctum) leaf with aloe vera (Aloe barbadensis) gel in a Carbopol 940 base. Acne vulgaris is one of the most common reasons young Indians walk into a dermatology OPD or a pharmacy, and topical antibiotics such as clindamycin are increasingly limited by bacterial resistance. Herbal gels are widely sold in Indian pharmacies, but many are marketed with little published evaluation data.
The group prepares four gel batches (F1–F4) that differ only in Carbopol concentration, then evaluates them for appearance, homogeneity, pH, viscosity, spreadability, extrudability, marker content (total phenolics by the Folin–Ciocalteu method), in-vitro release through a dialysis membrane in a Franz diffusion cell, and antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis by agar-well diffusion, compared with a marketed 1% clindamycin gel. The optimised batch is placed on accelerated stability at 40 ± 2 °C / 75 ± 5% RH as per ICH Q1A(R2).
The study is designed for the PCI B.Pharm BP813PW Project Work slot and ties directly to the Semester VIII electives BP809ET Cosmetic Science and BP806ET Quality Control and Standardization of Herbals, as PCI requires. All results are analysed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test in GraphPad Prism, which gives the group a clear, defensible basis for choosing the optimised formulation.
Syllabus alignment
PCI · ER-2014/2020 syllabus
BP813PW · Project Work · Semester 8 · 6 credits · 150 = report 75 (objectives 15, methodology 20, results 20, conclusions 20; same for group) + individual presentation 75 (presentation 25, communication 20, Q&A 30)
- Subjects this project applies
- BP809ET Cosmetic Science
- BP806ET Quality Control and Standardization of Herbals
- BP801T Biostatistics and Research Methodology
- BP502T Industrial Pharmacy I
- How it is evaluated
Team: group ≤ 5
typed, bound, ≥ 25 pages, submitted in triplicate; internal + external examiner, ~30 min per group