Skip to content

Dental Caries (DMFT/dmft) and Oral Hygiene (OHI-S) Among 6–12-Year-Old Government School Children: A Survey

  • 12 slides
  • 15 viva questions
  • 3 modules
  • No code needed

@school-children-dmft-ohis-surveyUpdated Oct 2026

300 children, WHO basic-methods charting, and a hygiene index that tells the school what to fix first

BDS, Public Health Dentistry · Year 3–4 · Beginner · 12 weeks · Team of 2

More info
Level
Beginner · 12 weeks · Team of 2
Relevant for
All India
Common at
DCI (BDS), RGUHS, KUHS
Syllabus
DCI DCI BDS · Public Health Dentistry community survey / ICMR-STS study (optional research slot) · Year 3–4
Tech stack
  • WHO Oral Health Surveys: Basic Methods (5th ed.) examination criteria
  • DMFT / dmft index
  • Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S, Greene & Vermillion)
  • Plane mouth mirrors and CPI probes under natural light
  • Structured oral-health-behaviour questionnaire
  • Google Forms / Excel
  • SPSS
For educational purposes only

Unlock this project

Full PPT + speaker notes, the step-by-step method, READMEFIRST, instructions and all 15 viva answers.

One-time. No subscription, no auto-renew, no drama.

Project packs

Credits never expire and work on any project. Use one here, save the rest for your friend who “will pay you back”.

  1. Pinned

    1 min

    Overview

    Dental caries is the most common chronic disease of childhood, and in India it often goes untreated in children attending government schools, where families have limited access to dental care. School surveys are the standard way public health dentistry departments measure the problem and plan preventive programmes such as supervised tooth-brushing, pit-and-fissure sealant camps and oral-health education.

    This project is a cross-sectional school-based oral-health survey of about 300 children aged 6–12 years in government primary and higher-primary schools near the dental college. Two BDS students, trained and calibrated by the guide, examine each child under natural light with plane mouth mirrors and CPI probes, following the WHO Oral Health Surveys: Basic Methods (5th edition) diagnostic criteria. Caries experience is recorded as dmft for primary teeth and DMFT for permanent teeth, and oral hygiene is measured with the Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) of Greene and Vermillion. A short questionnaire records brushing frequency, dentifrice use, snacking between meals and previous dental visits.

    Results are analysed in SPSS to report caries prevalence, mean dmft/DMFT, the care index, OHI-S grades and their associations with age, gender and oral-hygiene habits. Every child receives oral-health education, and those needing treatment are referred to the college's Department of Pedodontics with a referral card. The study fits the DCI BDS Public Health Dentistry community-survey slot and can also be submitted as an ICMR-STS proposal.

    Syllabus alignment

    DCI · DCI BDS

    Public Health Dentistry community survey / ICMR-STS study (optional research slot) · Year 3–4

    Subjects this project applies
    • Public Health Dentistry — dental indices (DMFT, dmft, OHI-S)
    • Public Health Dentistry — oral epidemiology and survey procedures
    • Public Health Dentistry — biostatistics and research methodology
    • Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry — caries in mixed dentition
    • Public Health Dentistry — school oral-health programmes
    How it is evaluated

    See your department's project guidelines.

    1 min read · 15 viva questions

  2. 2 min

    Synopsis

    Abstract

    A cross-sectional survey will be carried out among 300 children aged 6–12 years in government schools to assess the prevalence of dental caries and oral-hygiene status. Examinations will follow WHO Basic Methods (5th edition) criteria by two calibrated examiners. Caries will be recorded with dmft and DMFT and oral hygiene with OHI-S. Associations with age, gender and oral-hygiene practices will be tested with chi-square, t-test and ANOVA.

    Introduction

    Caries in primary teeth causes pain, infection, missed school days and early loss of space for permanent teeth. The first permanent molars erupt around six years of age and are highly vulnerable in the following years. Oral hygiene is closely linked to caries and gingivitis, and school-age children are an ideal target for prevention because habits are still forming and schools provide organised access.

    Review and gap

    Indian school surveys report widely varying caries prevalence depending on region, diet, fluoride exposure and examination criteria. Many studies do not state examiner calibration or use non-standard criteria, making comparison difficult. There is no recent local data for the schools in the college's outreach area.

    Proposed work

    • Calibrate two examiners against the guide using WHO criteria and calculate kappa.
    • Examine children by stratified random sampling across age groups.
    • Record dmft/DMFT, OHI-S and a short behaviour questionnaire.
    • Provide oral-health education and referral for treatment needs.

    Expected outcome

    The survey will give school-wise and age-wise estimates of caries prevalence, mean dmft and DMFT, the care index and OHI-S grades, identify habits linked with poor oral health, and produce a referral list so that affected children actually reach treatment at the college.

    Feasibility

    • Access: schools in the outreach area already cooperate with the department's camps.
    • Resources: mirrors, probes, gloves and sterilisation from the department; forms printed in-house.
    • Time: 25–30 children per school day; data collection in four weeks.
    • Ethics: IEC approval, Block Education Officer and headmaster permission, parental consent and child assent.
  3. 1 min

    Problem statement

    Government schools in the dental college's outreach area serve children from low-income families who rarely visit a dentist until they are in pain. The Department of Public Health Dentistry conducts camps, but it has no recent, standardised data on how many children have caries, how much of it is untreated, and how poor their oral hygiene is. Without such baseline figures, preventive programmes cannot be prioritised or evaluated.

    This study aims to measure the prevalence and severity of dental caries (dmft/DMFT) and oral-hygiene status (OHI-S) among 6–12-year-old government school children using WHO-standard methods, to identify associated behaviours such as brushing frequency and between-meal snacking, and to provide treatment referral and education, giving the department and schools a baseline for targeted preventive action.

  4. 1 min

    Objectives & scope

    1. 01Determine the prevalence of dental caries among 6–12-year-old government school children.
    2. 02Assess mean dmft and DMFT scores and the care index by age and gender.
    3. 03Assess oral-hygiene status using the Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S).
    4. 04Assess oral-hygiene practices and dietary habits through a short questionnaire.
    5. 05Find associations between caries experience, OHI-S and oral-hygiene practices.
    6. 06Provide oral-health education to all participants and refer children with treatment needs.

    Scope

    In scope

    • Children aged 6–12 years in selected government schools with parental consent and child assent.
    • Clinical examination for caries (WHO Basic Methods 5th ed.) and OHI-S; a short behaviour questionnaire answered by the child with teacher support.
    • Descriptive and analytic statistics; education and referral.

    Out of scope

    • Radiographs, caries-activity tests or salivary analysis.
    • Treatment within the survey (children are referred to the college).
    • Private schools and children under 6 years (future comparison).
  5. 2 min

    Methodology

    Study design: descriptive cross-sectional school-based survey.

    Setting and duration: government primary and higher-primary schools in the outreach area of the dental college; 12 weeks (weeks 1–3 approvals and calibration, weeks 4–8 examinations, weeks 9–12 analysis and report).

    Sample size: assuming caries prevalence of 55% from Indian school studies, absolute precision of 6% and 95% confidence, n = Z²pq/d² = (1.96² × 0.55 × 0.45)/0.06² ≈ 264. Adding 10% for absentees and refusals gives about 290; the study examines 300 children.

    Sampling: list of government schools from the Block Education Office; four schools selected by simple random sampling; within each school, children stratified by age (6–8, 9–10, 11–12 years) and selected by systematic random sampling from class registers.

    Inclusion criteria: children aged 6–12 years present on the examination day, with signed parental consent and verbal assent.

    Exclusion criteria: children with systemic illness or special health-care needs requiring a different examination setting, those undergoing orthodontic treatment, and uncooperative children.

    Examiner calibration: both examiners are trained by the guide and examine 20 children twice, one week apart; intra- and inter-examiner agreement assessed with Cohen's kappa (target ≥ 0.8).

    Examination: child seated on an ordinary chair facing natural light; plane mouth mirror and CPI probe; WHO 5th-edition codes for crown status; dmft for primary and DMFT for permanent teeth. OHI-S: debris and calculus index on six index teeth (16, 11, 26, 36 buccal/labial; 31 labial; 46 lingual), scores 0–3 each; OHI-S = DI-S + CI-S; graded good (0.0–1.2), fair (1.3–3.0), poor (3.1–6.0).

    Questionnaire: brushing frequency, aid and dentifrice, between-meal sweets, previous dental visit.

    Ethics: IEC approval; permission from the Block Education Officer and headmasters; written informed consent from parents in the local language and verbal assent from children; only a study number is recorded; infection control per standard precautions; ICMR National Ethical Guidelines (2017) for research with children.

    Statistical analysis: SPSS. Prevalence with 95% CI; mean ± SD of dmft, DMFT and OHI-S; care index = F/DMFT × 100; independent t-test (gender), one-way ANOVA (age groups), chi-square (caries vs practices), Pearson or Spearman correlation between OHI-S and DMFT; p < 0.05.

  6. 1 min

    Architecture & tech stack

    • WHO Oral Health Surveys: Basic Methods (5th ed.) examination criteria
    • DMFT / dmft index
    • Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S, Greene & Vermillion)
    • Plane mouth mirrors and CPI probes under natural light
    • Structured oral-health-behaviour questionnaire
    • Google Forms / Excel
    • SPSS

    The survey follows the WHO pathway: permissions → calibration → sampling → examination → education/referral → analysis. Calibration is a gate — examinations do not start until kappa reaches the target.

    flowchart TD
      A[Protocol and forms] --> B[IEC approval]
      B --> C[Block Education Officer and headmaster permission]
      C --> D[Examiner training and calibration on 20 children]
      D --> E{Kappa at least 0.8?}
      E -->|No| D
      E -->|Yes| F[Random selection of schools and children]
      F --> G[Parental consent forms sent home]
      G --> H{Consent and assent obtained?}
      H -->|No| I[Child not examined]
      H -->|Yes| J[Questionnaire on habits]
      J --> K[Examination: dmft, DMFT, OHI-S]
      K --> L[Oral-health education session]
      K --> M[Referral card if treatment needed]
      L --> N[Data entry and SPSS analysis]
      M --> N
      N --> O[Report and feedback to schools]

    Recording format

    Each child has one form with a study number, age, gender, class, school code, the 52-tooth crown-status chart, six OHI-S tooth scores for debris and calculus, questionnaire responses and the referral decision. The form mirrors the WHO basic-methods assessment form so that results are comparable with national and international surveys.

  7. 3 modules

    Modules

    • Member 1 — Permissions, calibration and caries examination

      Obtains IEC, education-office and school permissions, organises calibration sessions with the guide, and records crown status for every child to compute dmft and DMFT using WHO 5th-edition codes.

    • Member 2 — OHI-S, questionnaire, education and analysis

      Records OHI-S debris and calculus scores on the six index teeth, administers the habits questionnaire, conducts the education session and referral, and enters and analyses data in SPSS with the planned tests.

    • Shared — Report and school feedback

      Both members write the report chapters for their own sections, prepare the combined results and discussion, and present a one-page summary to each headmaster with recommendations for supervised brushing.

  8. Locked

    Presentation

    12 slides with speaker notes. The outline below is free; the bullets, notes and the generated .pptx unlock with the project.

    1. Dental Caries and Oral Hygiene Among Government School Children
    2. Introduction
    3. Need for the Study
    4. Objectives
    5. Methodology
    6. Indices and Calibration
    7. Study Flow
    8. Results — Caries
    9. Results — Oral Hygiene and Habits
    10. Discussion
    11. Limitations
    12. Conclusion and Recommendations

    Bullets, speaker notes and the .pptx download unlock with the project.

    Presentation is locked: 12 slides, Speaker notes, .pptx download.

  9. Locked

    How to run

    A research, analysis or design project, so there's no code bundle: 10 steps to carry it out with WHO Oral Health Surveys: Basic Methods (5th ed.) examination criteria, DMFT / dmft index and Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S, Greene & Vermillion).

    The good part is behind this lock. Like every good viva answer.

    How to run is locked: 10 steps.

  10. 1 min

    Future scope

    • Interventional follow-up: supervised daily tooth-brushing with fluoride toothpaste in the same schools, re-measured after six months.
    • Pit-and-fissure sealant programme for first permanent molars, with retention checks.
    • Comparison with private-school children to study socioeconomic gradients.
    • Early-childhood caries survey in anganwadi centres.
    • Fluoride estimation in local drinking water to explain regional variation.
  11. 6 sources

    References

    1. World Health Organization. Oral Health Surveys: Basic Methods. 5th ed. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
    2. Greene JC, Vermillion JR. The Simplified Oral Hygiene Index. J Am Dent Assoc. 1964;68:7–13.
    3. Dental Council of India — BDS Course Regulations
    4. Peter S. Essentials of Public Health Dentistry. Arya Medi Publishing House (latest edition).
    5. Hiremath SS. Textbook of Preventive and Community Dentistry. Elsevier India.
    6. Indian Council of Medical Research — National Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical and Health Research Involving Human Participants (2017), section on research with children

    Cite this bundle

    OnlyProjects. (2026). Dental Caries (DMFT/dmft) and Oral Hygiene (OHI-S) Among 6–12-Year-Old Government School Children: A Survey: BDS Public Health Dentistry project bundle [Educational resource]. https://onlyprojects.online/projects/bds-public-health-school-children-dmft-ohis-survey

Slides, diagrams & files

12 slides. Titles are free; bullets, speaker notes and the .pptx unlock with the project.

  1. SLIDE 1

    Dental Caries and Oral Hygiene Among Government School Children

  2. SLIDE 2

    Introduction

  3. SLIDE 3

    Need for the Study

  4. SLIDE 4

    Objectives

  5. SLIDE 5

    Methodology

  6. SLIDE 6

    Indices and Calibration

  7. SLIDE 7

    Study Flow

  8. SLIDE 8

    Results — Caries

  9. SLIDE 9

    Results — Oral Hygiene and Habits

  10. SLIDE 10

    Discussion

  11. SLIDE 11

    Limitations

  12. SLIDE 12

    Conclusion and Recommendations

Architecture diagram

1
flowchart TD
  A[Protocol and forms] --> B[IEC approval]
  B --> C[Block Education Officer and headmaster permission]
  C --> D[Examiner training and calibration on 20 children]
  D --> E{Kappa at least 0.8?}
  E -->|No| D
  E -->|Yes| F[Random selection of schools and children]
  F --> G[Parental consent forms sent home]
  G --> H{Consent and assent obtained?}
  H -->|No| I[Child not examined]
  H -->|Yes| J[Questionnaire on habits]
  J --> K[Examination: dmft, DMFT, OHI-S]
  K --> L[Oral-health education session]
  K --> M[Referral card if treatment needed]
  L --> N[Data entry and SPSS analysis]
  M --> N
  N --> O[Report and feedback to schools]

Files

Viva questions & answers

3 of 15 questions free. Explain each answer in your own words before you move on.

  1. Concept

    What is the DMFT index and what are its limitations?

    DMFT, introduced by Klein, Palmer and Knutson, counts permanent teeth that are decayed, missing due to caries or filled. It is simple and universally used, but it gives equal weight to a small lesion and an extracted tooth, can be inflated by teeth missing for other reasons, and does not reflect treatment needs or early non-cavitated lesions.

  2. Concept

    How does dmft differ from DMFT?

    dmft is used for primary teeth and DMFT for permanent teeth. In mixed dentition both are recorded separately and never added together. In dmft, the m component is often restricted to teeth indicated for extraction or missing due to caries, because primary teeth exfoliate naturally.

  3. Concept

    Name the index teeth and surfaces for OHI-S.

    The six index teeth are the maxillary right first molar (16) buccal, maxillary right central incisor (11) labial, maxillary left first molar (26) buccal, mandibular left first molar (36) lingual, mandibular left central incisor (31) labial and mandibular right first molar (46) lingual. Debris and calculus are each scored 0–3.

+12 more questions

They and the answers unlock with the project. Try answering the ones above yourself first. Your examiner will.

For educational purposes only. Use this bundle to understand how the project works, then build and write your own. Submitting it verbatim is between you, your conscience and your external examiner.