Skip to content

Transit-Oriented Urban Design for the 500 m Influence Zone of a Namma Metro Interchange, Bengaluru

  • 12 slides
  • 15 viva questions
  • 6 modules
  • No code needed

@tod-metro-interchange-influence-zone-bengaluruUpdated Oct 2026

An M.Arch urban-design thesis about the ten-minute walk nobody designed

M.Arch, Urban Design · Sem 10 · Advanced · 24 weeks · Solo

More info
Level
Advanced · 24 weeks · Solo
Relevant for
All India
Common at
Council of Architecture (COA 2020 norms), Anna University, Visvesvaraya Technological University
Syllabus
COA COA 2020 · Architectural Design Thesis / Dissertation (individual; jury with external examiner) · Semester 10
Tech stack
  • QGIS
  • Rhino / Grasshopper
  • AutoCAD
  • SketchUp
  • Lumion / Enscape
  • Excel (density and FAR scenarios)
  • Street-audit and pedestrian-count survey sheets
For educational purposes only

Unlock this project

Full PPT + speaker notes, the step-by-step method, READMEFIRST, instructions and all 15 viva answers.

One-time. No subscription, no auto-renew, no drama.

Project packs

Credits never expire and work on any project. Use one here, save the rest for your friend who “will pay you back”.

  1. Pinned

    1 min

    Overview

    This M.Arch thesis designs the 500-metre influence zone around a Namma Metro interchange station in Bengaluru as a transit-oriented neighbourhood. Metro stations in the city have been built fast, but the areas around them still work as if the metro did not exist: long compound walls, missing footpaths, surface parking, auto-rickshaw scrums at the exit, and low-rise plots that cannot add homes or jobs near the station. People who could walk ten minutes to the metro instead take a two-wheeler.

    The thesis uses the National Transit Oriented Development Policy 2017 and the Metro Rail Policy 2017 of the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, the URDPFI Guidelines 2015, and the ITDP TOD Standard as its policy base. It maps the existing zone in QGIS — land use, building footprints, plot sizes, street network, block size, footpath continuity, and walking catchments along the real street network — and scores it against TOD principles: walk, cycle, connect, transit, mix, densify, compact and shift.

    The design proposes a station-area plan with a new pedestrian and cycle network, a multimodal interchange plaza, active street edges, a density and mixed-use framework tested as three FAR scenarios in Rhino/Grasshopper, and detailed urban design for two key streets and the interchange plaza. Deliverables are an urban-design framework, design guidelines, street sections, a 1:1000 area model and a 1:200 plaza model, defended before an external jury.

    Syllabus alignment

    COA · COA 2020

    Architectural Design Thesis / Dissertation (individual; jury with external examiner) · Semester 10

    Subjects this project applies
    • Urban Design Studio
    • Urban Design Theory and Methods
    • Urban Planning and Development Regulations (URDPFI 2015)
    • Transportation and Urban Form
    • GIS and Digital Tools for Urban Design (QGIS, Grasshopper)
    • Research Methods / Thesis Seminar
    How it is evaluated

    Team: individual

    thesis jury: site + programme + concept + drawings + model; external juror

    1 min read · 15 viva questions

  2. 2 min

    Synopsis

    Abstract

    Bengaluru's metro network is expanding quickly, yet land around stations remains car- and two-wheeler-oriented. National policy asks cities to plan the 500–800 m around stations for higher density, mixed use and walking. This thesis translates that policy into an urban-design proposal for one interchange station's influence zone, demonstrating how streets, plots and public spaces can be reorganised so that walking and cycling to the metro become the obvious choice.

    Introduction

    The chosen zone (the station is not named in this bundle; the student selects one) combines older residential layouts, a commercial arterial, a few large institutional campuses and vacant or under-used government land. Interchange stations attract the heaviest footfall and the worst congestion at their exits, making them the most demanding test case for TOD.

    Literature review and gap

    Peter Calthorpe's work defined the TOD idea of compact, walkable development around transit; Jan Gehl's work on public life gives methods to observe how people actually use streets; the ITDP TOD Standard converts principles into measurable indicators. Indian policy documents set targets but leave the design of individual station areas to cities. Published Indian studies are mostly policy critiques or city-scale analyses; few show a plot-by-plot, street-by-street design for a real station area with density scenarios tested against infrastructure and open-space norms. This thesis addresses that gap.

    Existing condition vs proposed approach

    • Existing: large blocks, discontinuous footpaths, gated campuses blocking short-cuts, surface parking, informal feeder stops, uniform low FAR regardless of distance from the station.
    • Proposed: a fine-grained pedestrian network with new through-block links, continuous shaded footpaths and cycle tracks, an organised feeder interchange for buses, autos and cabs, active frontages, graded density and mixed use highest near the station, and managed parking.

    Feasibility

    • Technical: all analysis uses open data (OpenStreetMap, Bhuvan imagery) plus the student's own surveys; tools are QGIS and Grasshopper.
    • Regulatory: the proposal works within the national TOD policy's recommendations and suggests changes to local development regulations as an influence-zone overlay.
    • Social: the design keeps existing street vending and adds space for it, and avoids displacement by using under-used public land first.
  3. 1 min

    Problem statement

    Metro stations in Bengaluru are surrounded by urban form that discourages people from walking to them. Blocks are large and fenced, footpaths are broken or occupied, feeder transport clusters chaotically at exits, and development regulations do not allow more homes and jobs close to the station than far from it. The result is under-used transit capacity, congestion at station entries, and continued dependence on private vehicles despite large public investment in the metro.

    National policy recommends compact, mixed-use, walkable development in station influence zones, but there are few worked examples of what this means for a specific Indian station area. The problem this thesis addresses is: how can the 500 m influence zone of a metro interchange be redesigned — its streets, blocks, plots and public spaces — so that walking, cycling and feeder transit become the dominant ways of reaching the station, while density and mixed use increase within the capacity of infrastructure and open space?

  4. 1 min

    Objectives & scope

    1. 01Map and analyse the influence zone's land use, plot pattern, block size, street network, footpath continuity and walking catchment in QGIS.
    2. 02Observe pedestrian movement and public life at station exits and key streets using counts and behaviour mapping.
    3. 03Score the existing zone against the ITDP TOD Standard principles and national TOD policy recommendations.
    4. 04Propose a pedestrian and cycle network with new through-block links that shortens walking routes to the station.
    5. 05Test three density and mixed-use scenarios in Grasshopper against open-space, infrastructure and height limits.
    6. 06Design the multimodal interchange plaza and two key streets in detail, with street sections and design guidelines.
    7. 07Prepare an urban-design framework, guidelines, drawings and models for the thesis jury.

    Scope

    In scope

    • The 500 m influence zone around one interchange station, with a context study to 800 m.
    • Urban-design framework: movement, land use, density, open space, built form.
    • Detailed design of the interchange plaza and two streets at 1:500 and 1:200, with sections at 1:100.
    • Design guidelines for plots (setbacks, frontage, height, parking) inside the zone.

    Out of scope

    • Architectural design of individual buildings beyond massing.
    • Traffic micro-simulation; movement is analysed with network analysis, counts and design standards.
    • Financial modelling of land value capture beyond a qualitative discussion of policy tools.
    • Statutory amendment of the master plan.
  5. 1 min

    Methodology

    The thesis runs over two semesters as a research-by-design study.

    StageWeeksWorkOutput
    1. Literature & policy1–4TOD theory, national policies, ITDP Standard, precedents (Indian and international station areas)Literature review, indicator list
    2. Data & mapping5–8QGIS base from OpenStreetMap and imagery, footprint and land-use mapping on site, network walk-catchment analysisAnalysis maps
    3. Field surveys9–11Pedestrian counts at exits (peak hours), behaviour mapping, footpath audit, feeder-mode observation, short intercept interviewsSurvey data and maps
    4. Diagnosis12–13TOD scoring, SWOT, key issuesDiagnosis sheet
    5. Framework & scenarios14–17Movement framework, density scenarios in Grasshopper, open-space and infrastructure checksFramework sheets
    6. Detailed design18–22Interchange plaza, two streets, guidelinesDesign sheets and sections
    7. Jury23–24Models, renders, reportFinal submission

    Methods: document review, GIS spatial analysis, network analysis, direct observation and counts, intercept interviews, comparative precedent analysis and scenario testing. Results are reported as the student's own measured values, never borrowed figures.

  6. 1 min

    Architecture & tech stack

    • QGIS
    • Rhino / Grasshopper
    • AutoCAD
    • SketchUp
    • Lumion / Enscape
    • Excel (density and FAR scenarios)
    • Street-audit and pedestrian-count survey sheets

    The flowchart below is the study design used in the report.

    flowchart TD
      A[TOD policy and literature] --> B[Indicator framework]
      C[QGIS base map: OSM + imagery] --> D[Land use, plots, blocks, streets]
      D --> E[Network walk catchment from station exits]
      F[Field surveys: counts, audits, interviews] --> G[Diagnosis and TOD score]
      B --> G
      E --> G
      G --> H[Movement framework]
      G --> I[Density and mixed-use scenarios in Grasshopper]
      I --> J{Checks: open space, infrastructure, height}
      J --> K[Preferred scenario]
      H --> L[Urban-design framework and guidelines]
      K --> L
      L --> M[Detailed design: plaza + two streets]
      M --> N[Jury sheets, models, report]

    Analysis layers in QGIS

    • Land use by plot, building footprints and heights (field-verified)
    • Street network with footpath presence, width and obstruction
    • Block perimeters and intersection density
    • Walking catchment from each station exit along the network, compared with the 500 m radius
    • Open spaces, public land and vacant/under-used plots

    Design principles

    Walk (continuous, shaded, safe footpaths) · Cycle (protected tracks to the station) · Connect (short blocks, new links) · Transit (organised feeder interchange) · Mix (active ground floors) · Densify (graded FAR near the station) · Compact · Shift (managed, reduced parking).

  7. 6 modules

    Modules

    • Policy & Literature Framework

      Reviews the National TOD Policy 2017, Metro Rail Policy 2017, URDPFI 2015 and the ITDP TOD Standard alongside Calthorpe and Gehl, and turns them into a list of measurable indicators used to score the station area.

    • GIS Mapping & Network Analysis

      Builds the QGIS base from OpenStreetMap and imagery, maps land use and footprints verified on site, and computes walking catchments from each station exit along the real street network to show where the 500 m circle is a myth.

    • Field Surveys & Public Life Study

      Counts pedestrians at station exits in peak hours, maps behaviour and conflict points, audits footpath continuity and obstructions, and records short intercept interviews on how people reach the station.

    • Density & Mixed-Use Scenarios

      Models three FAR and land-use scenarios in Rhino/Grasshopper, calculates added population and jobs, and checks each against open-space norms, infrastructure capacity and height limits to select a preferred scenario.

    • Movement & Interchange Design

      Designs a pedestrian and cycle network with new through-block links and a multimodal interchange plaza that separates bus, auto, cab and pedestrian flows at the station exits.

    • Street Design & Guidelines

      Details two key streets with sections, footpaths, cycle tracks, vending zones, trees and crossings, and writes plot-level guidelines for frontage, setbacks, heights and parking in the influence zone.

  8. Locked

    Presentation

    12 slides with speaker notes. The outline below is free; the bullets, notes and the generated .pptx unlock with the project.

    1. TOD for a Metro Interchange, Bengaluru
    2. The problem
    3. Policy & theory
    4. Study area
    5. Walk catchment
    6. Field surveys
    7. Diagnosis
    8. Framework
    9. Density scenarios
    10. Interchange plaza
    11. Streets & guidelines
    12. Conclusion

    Bullets, speaker notes and the .pptx download unlock with the project.

    Presentation is locked: 12 slides, Speaker notes, .pptx download.

  9. 1 min

    Future scope

    • Carry out a before-and-after pedestrian study if any street improvements are implemented.
    • Develop a land value capture model for funding the interchange plaza and street works.
    • Extend the framework to the full 800 m zone and to adjacent stations along the corridor.
    • Test pedestrian flows at the plaza with agent-based simulation.
    • Study affordable-housing inclusion inside the influence zone to limit displacement.
  10. 7 sources

    References

    1. National Transit Oriented Development Policy, 2017 — Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs
    2. Metro Rail Policy, 2017 — Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs
    3. URDPFI Guidelines, 2015 — Town and Country Planning Organisation, MoHUA
    4. TOD Standard — Institute for Transportation and Development Policy
    5. Calthorpe, P. — The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream (1993)
    6. Gehl, J. — Cities for People (2010)
    7. QGIS User Guide

    Cite this bundle

    OnlyProjects. (2026). Transit-Oriented Urban Design for the 500 m Influence Zone of a Namma Metro Interchange, Bengaluru: M.Arch Urban Design project bundle [Educational resource]. https://onlyprojects.online/projects/march-urban-tod-metro-interchange-influence-zone-bengaluru

Slides, diagrams & files

12 slides. Titles are free; bullets, speaker notes and the .pptx unlock with the project.

  1. SLIDE 1

    TOD for a Metro Interchange, Bengaluru

  2. SLIDE 2

    The problem

  3. SLIDE 3

    Policy & theory

  4. SLIDE 4

    Study area

  5. SLIDE 5

    Walk catchment

  6. SLIDE 6

    Field surveys

  7. SLIDE 7

    Diagnosis

  8. SLIDE 8

    Framework

  9. SLIDE 9

    Density scenarios

  10. SLIDE 10

    Interchange plaza

  11. SLIDE 11

    Streets & guidelines

  12. SLIDE 12

    Conclusion

Architecture diagram

1
flowchart TD
  A[TOD policy and literature] --> B[Indicator framework]
  C[QGIS base map: OSM + imagery] --> D[Land use, plots, blocks, streets]
  D --> E[Network walk catchment from station exits]
  F[Field surveys: counts, audits, interviews] --> G[Diagnosis and TOD score]
  B --> G
  E --> G
  G --> H[Movement framework]
  G --> I[Density and mixed-use scenarios in Grasshopper]
  I --> J{Checks: open space, infrastructure, height}
  J --> K[Preferred scenario]
  H --> L[Urban-design framework and guidelines]
  K --> L
  L --> M[Detailed design: plaza + two streets]
  M --> N[Jury sheets, models, report]

Files

Viva questions & answers

3 of 15 questions free. Explain each answer in your own words before you move on.

  1. Concept

    What is transit-oriented development?

    It is a planning and design approach that concentrates homes, jobs and services within walking distance of high-capacity transit, with mixed land use, higher density and streets designed for walking and cycling, so that transit becomes the natural choice for daily trips.

  2. Concept

    Why is a 500 m circle not the same as a walking catchment?

    A circle assumes you can walk in a straight line in every direction. Real routes follow streets and are blocked by fenced campuses, railway lines and missing crossings, so the area actually reachable within 500 m of walking is often much smaller, which my network analysis showed.

  3. Concept

    Which principles of the ITDP TOD Standard did you apply?

    I applied all eight principles — walk, cycle, connect, transit, mix, densify, compact and shift — and used their indicators to score the existing zone and the proposal, such as footpath continuity, block length, active frontage and off-street parking area.

+12 more questions

They and the answers unlock with the project. Try answering the ones above yourself first. Your examiner will.

For educational purposes only. Use this bundle to understand how the project works, then build and write your own. Submitting it verbatim is between you, your conscience and your external examiner.