Skip to content

Affordable Rental Housing Typologies for Industrial Workers in the Chakan MIDC Belt, Pune (ARHC)

  • 12 slides
  • 15 viva questions
  • 6 modules
  • No code needed

@arhc-rental-housing-typologies-chakan-puneUpdated Oct 2026

An M.Arch housing thesis that compares four ways to fit a decent 30 m² home next to a factory gate

M.Arch, Residential Design · Sem 10 · Advanced · 24 weeks · Solo

More info
Level
Advanced · 24 weeks · Solo
Relevant for
All India
Common at
Council of Architecture (COA 2020 norms), Anna University, Visvesvaraya Technological University
Syllabus
COA COA 2020 · Architectural Design Thesis / Dissertation (individual; jury with external examiner) · Semester 10
Tech stack
  • AutoCAD
  • Revit
  • SketchUp
  • Rhino / Grasshopper (density and daylight tests)
  • Ladybug (daylight / sunlight hours)
  • QGIS
  • Excel (area, density and cost comparison)
  • Household survey questionnaire
For educational purposes only

Unlock this project

Full PPT + speaker notes, the step-by-step method, READMEFIRST, instructions and all 15 viva answers.

One-time. No subscription, no auto-renew, no drama.

Project packs

Credits never expire and work on any project. Use one here, save the rest for your friend who “will pay you back”.

  1. Pinned

    1 min

    Overview

    This M.Arch thesis studies affordable rental housing for industrial workers in the Chakan MIDC belt near Pune, one of Maharashtra's largest automotive and engineering clusters. Thousands of contract and migrant workers live in single rooms rented from local landlords in villages around the industrial estate — often one room shared by four or five people, a common toilet for many rooms, and a long walk or shared-auto ride to the factory gate.

    The Affordable Rental Housing Complexes (ARHC) component of the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana – Urban was introduced for exactly this group: urban migrants and workers who need rental, not ownership, housing near work. The scheme sets unit types for single-bedroom homes and dormitory beds, but the design of such complexes is left to developers and employers, and typical outcomes are repetitive slab blocks with dark corridors.

    The thesis compares four typologies — a four-storey walk-up, a courtyard cluster, an incremental row house and a dormitory-plus-family mix — on a real-scale test site. Each is designed and measured on dwelling units per hectare, carpet area per unit (EWS homes up to 30 m²), daylight and ventilation, open space per person, construction cost per unit, and flexibility for changing households. The tests are run in Revit, Grasshopper and Ladybug, and checked against NBC 2016 and Maharashtra's Unified Development Control and Promotion Regulations (UDCPR) 2020. The preferred typology is developed into a site plan, unit plans and a cluster model for the thesis jury.

    Syllabus alignment

    COA · COA 2020

    Architectural Design Thesis / Dissertation (individual; jury with external examiner) · Semester 10

    Subjects this project applies
    • Housing Studio / Architectural Design Studio
    • Housing Policy and Planning
    • Building Bye-laws and Development Control (UDCPR 2020, NBC 2016)
    • Building Economics and Cost Estimation
    • Climate-Responsive Design
    • Research Methods / Thesis Seminar
    How it is evaluated

    Team: individual

    thesis jury: site + programme + concept + drawings + model; external juror

    1 min read · 15 viva questions

  2. 2 min

    Synopsis

    Abstract

    Industrial workers in Pune's Chakan belt pay a large share of their wages for overcrowded rooms with poor sanitation. Rental housing near workplaces is a stated national policy goal under ARHC, yet there is little design research on which building typology gives the best combination of density, liveability and cost for this group. This thesis designs and compares four typologies on one site, measures them on a common set of indicators, and develops the best-performing one into a detailed housing proposal.

    Introduction

    The test site is a hypothetical plot on the edge of a village settlement next to the industrial estate, with road access, bus connections to factory gates and a mix of agricultural and newly built land around it. Users include single male workers on contract, young couples, and families with school-going children; household surveys establish their needs, rents paid and daily routines.

    Literature and precedent gap

    Indian housing design has strong precedents in low-rise, high-density living: Charles Correa's work on incremental housing and "open-to-sky" space, the Aranya low-cost housing project in Indore by B. V. Doshi's Vastu-Shilpa, and the incremental "half a good house" model of Alejandro Aravena's Elemental in Chile. These address ownership housing for the urban poor. Rental housing for mobile workers — with dormitories, short tenancies and shared facilities — has a very thin design literature in India. This thesis adapts lessons from ownership precedents to a rental model.

    Existing vs proposed approach

    • Existing: landlord-built rooms of 9–12 m² in village extensions, shared toilets, no open space, informal rents; or employer hostels in repetitive slab blocks.
    • Proposed: a designed rental complex with mixed unit types, internal courtyards, daylight in every habitable room, shared facilities that are genuinely usable (laundry, kitchen, crèche), and a layout that can convert dormitories into family units as demand changes.

    Feasibility

    • Technical: typologies use load-bearing or simple RCC frame construction with locally available fly-ash blocks, suitable for contractors in the region.
    • Regulatory: each typology is checked against UDCPR 2020 provisions for FSI, setbacks, open space and parking, and NBC 2016 Parts 3 and 4.
    • Economic: cost per unit and per bed is estimated from current regional schedule-of-rates items, and rents are compared with what surveyed workers already pay.
  3. 1 min

    Problem statement

    Workers in the Chakan industrial belt, many of them migrants on short contracts, live in overcrowded rented rooms with shared toilets, little daylight and no open space, and spend significant time and money travelling to work. The ARHC scheme under PMAY-U recognises the need for affordable rental housing near workplaces, but it does not answer the design question of which typology serves these workers best. Developers default to repetitive slab blocks that maximise unit counts but create dark corridors, poor ventilation and no social space.

    The problem this thesis addresses is: which housing typology — walk-up, courtyard cluster, incremental row housing or a dormitory–family mix — gives industrial workers in Chakan the best balance of density, liveability, flexibility and affordability, and how should that typology be designed in detail within the ARHC framework, UDCPR 2020 and NBC 2016?

  4. 1 min

    Objectives & scope

    1. 01Survey worker households on housing conditions, rents, household composition and daily travel to establish user needs.
    2. 02Review ARHC guidelines, housing policy and precedents in incremental and low-rise high-density housing.
    3. 03Design four typologies on the same test site to comparable levels of detail.
    4. 04Measure each typology on density, carpet area, daylight, ventilation, open space per person, cost per unit and flexibility.
    5. 05Check every typology against UDCPR 2020 and NBC 2016 requirements.
    6. 06Select and develop the best-performing typology into a site plan, cluster design, unit plans and details.
    7. 07Present comparison sheets, design drawings, models and a report to the thesis jury.

    Scope

    In scope

    • Household survey of workers in two or three villages around the industrial estate.
    • Four typologies designed at site-plan and unit-plan level on one test site.
    • Comparative evaluation on a fixed indicator set.
    • Detailed design of the selected typology: site plan 1:500, cluster plans 1:200, unit plans 1:50, sections, and one wall section.

    Out of scope

    • Detailed structural and services design.
    • Financial structuring of a concession under ARHC beyond a rent-versus-cost comparison.
    • Land acquisition or ownership questions.
    • Construction of prototypes.
  5. 1 min

    Methodology

    The thesis is a comparative typology study followed by design development, run over two semesters.

    StageWeeksWorkOutput
    1. Literature & policy1–4ARHC and PMAY-U guidelines, housing theory, precedents (Correa, Aranya, Elemental, employer housing)Literature review, precedent matrix
    2. Field study5–9Household survey (target 80–120 households), room measurements, photo documentation, interviews with landlords and a factory HR representativeSurvey data, user profiles
    3. Brief & indicators10–11Unit mix, shared facilities, indicator set and measurement methodsBrief, evaluation framework
    4. Typology design12–16Four typologies at site and unit level in Revit/GrasshopperTypology sheets
    5. Evaluation17–18Density, area, daylight (Ladybug), cost, flexibility scoring; code checksComparison matrix
    6. Design development19–22Detailed design of the selected typologyDesign drawings
    7. Jury23–24Models, renders, reportFinal submission

    Methods: document review, structured household survey with consent, measured room drawings, precedent analysis, design-based comparative testing with simulation, cost estimation from regional schedules of rates. All results in the report are the student's own measurements.

  6. 1 min

    Architecture & tech stack

    • AutoCAD
    • Revit
    • SketchUp
    • Rhino / Grasshopper (density and daylight tests)
    • Ladybug (daylight / sunlight hours)
    • QGIS
    • Excel (area, density and cost comparison)
    • Household survey questionnaire

    The study design used in the report:

    flowchart TD
      A[Policy review: ARHC, PMAY-U] --> D[Design brief and unit mix]
      B[Precedents: Correa, Aranya, Elemental] --> D
      C[Household survey and room documentation] --> D
      D --> E[Indicator framework]
      D --> F1[Walk-up typology]
      D --> F2[Courtyard cluster]
      D --> F3[Incremental row housing]
      D --> F4[Dormitory and family mix]
      F1 --> G{Measure: density, area, daylight, cost, flexibility}
      F2 --> G
      F3 --> G
      F4 --> G
      E --> G
      G --> H[Code check: UDCPR 2020, NBC 2016]
      H --> I[Selected typology]
      I --> J[Detailed design, models, report]
      J --> K[External jury]

    Indicator set

    IndicatorHow it is measured
    Densitydwelling units and beds per hectare
    Unit sizecarpet area per unit against the EWS limit of 30 m²
    Daylightshare of habitable rooms meeting a sunlight/daylight threshold in Ladybug
    Ventilationcross-ventilated units as a share of total
    Open spaceusable open space per person
    Costestimated construction cost per unit and per bed
    Flexibilitynumber of units that can convert between dormitory and family use

    Site checklist

    Access and bus routes to factory gates; surrounding land use; drainage and flooding; sun and wind; existing village fabric; social infrastructure (school, PHC, market) within walking distance.

  7. 6 modules

    Modules

    • Policy & Precedent Review

      Reviews ARHC under PMAY-U, UDCPR 2020 and NBC 2016 along with Correa's incremental housing, Aranya and Elemental, and extracts design lessons on density, open-to-sky space and incrementality relevant to rental workers' housing.

    • Household Survey & User Profiles

      Surveys worker households on room size, occupants, rent, sanitation, travel time and preferences, measures typical rented rooms, and builds three user profiles: single contract workers, young couples and families.

    • Typology Design

      Designs four typologies — walk-up, courtyard cluster, incremental row housing and dormitory–family mix — on the same test site and unit brief so that the comparison is fair.

    • Comparative Evaluation

      Measures each typology on density, carpet area, daylight in Ladybug, cross-ventilation, open space per person, cost per unit and flexibility, and ranks them in a transparent weighted matrix.

    • Code Compliance

      Checks FSI, setbacks, open space, parking, staircase widths, travel distance and fire requirements for each typology under UDCPR 2020 and NBC 2016 Parts 3 and 4.

    • Detailed Housing Design

      Develops the selected typology into a site plan, cluster plans, unit plans with furniture, sections, a wall section and shared-facility designs such as laundry, crèche and community kitchen.

  8. Locked

    Presentation

    12 slides with speaker notes. The outline below is free; the bullets, notes and the generated .pptx unlock with the project.

    1. Rental Housing Typologies, Chakan
    2. Context
    3. Policy: ARHC
    4. Precedents
    5. Survey findings
    6. Brief & indicators
    7. Four typologies
    8. Evaluation
    9. Code compliance
    10. Selected typology
    11. Details & model
    12. Conclusion

    Bullets, speaker notes and the .pptx download unlock with the project.

    Presentation is locked: 12 slides, Speaker notes, .pptx download.

  9. 1 min

    Future scope

    • Build a financial model for an ARHC concession combining employer contributions and rental income.
    • Carry out a post-occupancy evaluation of an existing worker-housing complex to refine the indicators.
    • Test prefabricated construction for faster delivery of the selected typology.
    • Extend the framework to women workers' hostels with specific safety and childcare needs.
    • Study how village landlords could be partners rather than competitors in rental housing supply.
  10. 7 sources

    References

    1. Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana – Urban: Affordable Rental Housing Complexes (ARHC) guidelines
    2. Unified Development Control and Promotion Regulations for Maharashtra State, 2020 — Urban Development Department, Government of Maharashtra
    3. National Building Code of India 2016 — Bureau of Indian Standards
    4. Correa, C. — The New Landscape: Urbanisation in the Third World (1985)
    5. Aravena, A. and Iacobelli, A. — Elemental: Incremental Housing and Participatory Design Manual (2016)
    6. Vastu-Shilpa Foundation — Aranya Low-Cost Housing, Indore (project documentation)
    7. Ladybug Tools documentation

    Cite this bundle

    OnlyProjects. (2026). Affordable Rental Housing Typologies for Industrial Workers in the Chakan MIDC Belt, Pune (ARHC): M.Arch Residential Design project bundle [Educational resource]. https://onlyprojects.online/projects/march-residential-arhc-rental-housing-typologies-chakan-pune

Slides, diagrams & files

12 slides. Titles are free; bullets, speaker notes and the .pptx unlock with the project.

  1. SLIDE 1

    Rental Housing Typologies, Chakan

  2. SLIDE 2

    Context

  3. SLIDE 3

    Policy: ARHC

  4. SLIDE 4

    Precedents

  5. SLIDE 5

    Survey findings

  6. SLIDE 6

    Brief & indicators

  7. SLIDE 7

    Four typologies

  8. SLIDE 8

    Evaluation

  9. SLIDE 9

    Code compliance

  10. SLIDE 10

    Selected typology

  11. SLIDE 11

    Details & model

  12. SLIDE 12

    Conclusion

Architecture diagram

1
flowchart TD
  A[Policy review: ARHC, PMAY-U] --> D[Design brief and unit mix]
  B[Precedents: Correa, Aranya, Elemental] --> D
  C[Household survey and room documentation] --> D
  D --> E[Indicator framework]
  D --> F1[Walk-up typology]
  D --> F2[Courtyard cluster]
  D --> F3[Incremental row housing]
  D --> F4[Dormitory and family mix]
  F1 --> G{Measure: density, area, daylight, cost, flexibility}
  F2 --> G
  F3 --> G
  F4 --> G
  E --> G
  G --> H[Code check: UDCPR 2020, NBC 2016]
  H --> I[Selected typology]
  I --> J[Detailed design, models, report]
  J --> K[External jury]

Files

Viva questions & answers

3 of 15 questions free. Explain each answer in your own words before you move on.

  1. Concept

    What is the ARHC component of PMAY-U and who is it for?

    Affordable Rental Housing Complexes is a component of the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana – Urban that supports rental housing for urban migrants, industrial workers and similar groups who need affordable homes near work but do not want or cannot afford to buy. It covers single-bedroom units and dormitory beds.

  2. Concept

    Why focus on rental rather than ownership housing?

    Many workers in Chakan are on short contracts and move between jobs and cities, so ownership ties them down and is unaffordable. Rental housing near work matches how they actually live, and it has been neglected in Indian housing design compared with ownership schemes.

  3. Concept

    What did you learn from the Aranya project?

    Aranya showed that a planned site with services and a core unit, combined with a clear hierarchy of streets and open spaces, can support dense, low-rise housing that residents extend over time. I used its hierarchy of spaces and incremental logic, adapted so the landlord rather than the resident controls expansion.

+12 more questions

They and the answers unlock with the project. Try answering the ones above yourself first. Your examiner will.

For educational purposes only. Use this bundle to understand how the project works, then build and write your own. Submitting it verbatim is between you, your conscience and your external examiner.