Skip to content

Employee Engagement and Intention to Stay in a 120-Employee Auto-Component SME, Peenya Industrial Area (SPSS)

  • 12 slides
  • 14 viva questions
  • 5 modules
  • No code needed

@employee-engagement-intention-to-stay-peenya-smeUpdated Oct 2026

An MSW HR dissertation using UWES-9, TIS-6 and a statutory welfare checklist to guide retention

MSW, HR & Labour Welfare · Sem 4 · Intermediate · 16 weeks · Solo

More info
Level
Intermediate · 16 weeks · Solo
Relevant for
Karnataka
Common at
Bengaluru City University, Bangalore University
Syllabus
Bangalore University / BCU MSW CBCS · SWHCP-4.5 (BU) / CPD-4.5 (BCU) Project Work: Dissertation / Case Study · Semester 4
Tech stack
  • Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9)
  • Turnover Intention Scale (TIS-6)
  • Labour welfare facilities checklist (Factories Act 1948 / OSH Code 2020)
  • Structured questionnaire (English and Kannada)
  • IBM SPSS Statistics
  • MS Excel
  • APA 7th edition referencing
For educational purposes only

Unlock this project

Full PPT + speaker notes, the step-by-step method, READMEFIRST, instructions and all 14 viva answers.

One-time. No subscription, no auto-renew, no drama.

Project packs

Credits never expire and work on any project. Use one here, save the rest for your friend who “will pay you back”.

  1. Pinned

    1 min

    Overview

    Employee Engagement and Intention to Stay is an MSW dissertation for the Human Resource Management / Labour Welfare specialisation. It studies a (fictional) auto-component manufacturer, Vruksha Precision Components Pvt. Ltd., with about 120 employees in the Peenya Industrial Area, Bengaluru — one of the thousands of small and medium enterprises that supply larger automobile companies and struggle to keep trained machine operators and supervisors.

    The project asks: how engaged are the firm's employees, how many are thinking of leaving, and which factors — engagement itself, welfare facilities, supervisor relationship, pay satisfaction, shift pattern — are linked to their intention to stay? It combines two established instruments, the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9) and the Turnover Intention Scale (TIS-6), with a short set of items on perceived welfare and supervisor support, and a statutory welfare checklist completed with the HR manager against the facilities required under the Factories Act, 1948 and the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020.

    Data from around 100 employees (census of all willing employees) are analysed in SPSS: descriptives, reliability, independent-samples t-tests and one-way ANOVA across departments, experience and shifts, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression predicting turnover intention.

    The bundle includes the synopsis, questionnaire structure, SPSS steps, ethics and management permission, the BCU CPD-4.5 dissertation format (70 report + 30 viva), a 12-slide presentation and a viva bank. It is a practical study: its output is a retention and welfare action plan the HR manager can actually use.

    Syllabus alignment

    Bangalore University / BCU · MSW CBCS

    SWHCP-4.5 (BU) / CPD-4.5 (BCU) · Project Work: Dissertation / Case Study · Semester 4 · 4 credits · 100 (BCU: report 70 + viva 30)

    Subjects this project applies
    • CPT-2.2 Social Work Research and Statistics (SPSS)
    • Human Resource Management specialisation papers
    • Labour Legislation and Labour Welfare
    • Organisational Behaviour and Industrial Relations
    • Concurrent field work and block placement in an industrial setting
    How it is evaluated

    See your department's project guidelines.

    1 min read · 14 viva questions

  2. 2 min

    Synopsis

    Abstract

    Small and medium manufacturing firms in India face high turnover among skilled and semi-skilled workers, which raises recruitment and training costs and affects quality. This dissertation studies employee engagement and intention to stay among employees of a 120-employee auto-component SME in Peenya Industrial Area, Bengaluru. Using UWES-9, TIS-6, items on welfare and supervisor support, and a statutory welfare checklist, it examines levels of engagement and turnover intention, differences across employee groups, and the predictors of intention to leave. Data are analysed in SPSS with t-tests, ANOVA, correlation and multiple regression. The findings are used to propose a retention and welfare action plan for the firm.

    Introduction

    Work engagement is a positive, fulfilling state of mind characterised by vigour, dedication and absorption (Schaufeli and Bakker). Engaged employees tend to perform better and stay longer. Turnover intention — a conscious wish to leave the organisation — is one of the strongest predictors of actual turnover. In labour-intensive SMEs, welfare facilities, relationships with supervisors and shift patterns shape everyday experience and may influence both engagement and the decision to stay.

    Review gap

    Engagement research in India is concentrated in IT, banking and large manufacturing firms. SMEs in industrial estates like Peenya, where workers are often migrants from other districts or states and where HR functions are small, are rarely studied. Few studies combine engagement with an assessment of statutory welfare provision, which is central to the labour welfare perspective of social work.

    Hypotheses

    • H1: Engagement will correlate negatively with turnover intention.
    • H2: Perceived welfare and supervisor support will correlate negatively with turnover intention.
    • H3: Engagement will differ across departments and shifts.
    • H4: Turnover intention will differ by experience group.
    • H5: Engagement, welfare and supervisor support will together predict turnover intention.

    Feasibility

    Management has agreed to provide access during the block placement. The questionnaire takes about 15 minutes and can be filled during a scheduled break. The firm's size permits a near-census. SPSS is available through the department.

  3. 1 min

    Problem statement

    Vruksha Precision Components, like many SMEs in Peenya Industrial Area, loses trained CNC operators, quality inspectors and line supervisors to competing firms and to larger companies in nearby industrial areas. Each exit means weeks of recruitment and training, rework on the shop floor and pressure on remaining workers. The HR manager, who handles recruitment, payroll and compliance single-handedly, has no systematic data on how engaged employees are, who is likely to leave, or which workplace factors matter most to them.

    Without such data, retention efforts are reactive — a pay revision after a wave of resignations, or festival bonuses — rather than targeted. This dissertation measures employee engagement and turnover intention in the firm, assesses the availability of statutory welfare facilities, examines how engagement, welfare and supervisor support relate to intention to stay across departments, shifts and experience groups, and proposes a practical retention and welfare plan grounded in the evidence and in labour welfare principles.

  4. 1 min

    Objectives & scope

    1. 01To study the socio-economic profile of employees of the firm.
    2. 02To measure the level of work engagement (vigour, dedication, absorption) using UWES-9.
    3. 03To measure turnover intention using TIS-6.
    4. 04To assess employees' perception of welfare facilities and supervisor support.
    5. 05To review the availability of statutory welfare facilities using a checklist with the HR manager.
    6. 06To examine differences in engagement and turnover intention across departments, shifts and experience.
    7. 07To identify predictors of turnover intention.
    8. 08To recommend a retention and welfare action plan for the firm.

    Scope

    In scope

    • All permanent and fixed-term employees of one auto-component SME in Peenya Industrial Area willing to participate (target about 100 of 120).
    • Measurement of engagement, turnover intention, perceived welfare and supervisor support.
    • A statutory welfare checklist completed with the HR manager and verified by observation.
    • Quantitative analysis in SPSS and a practical action plan.

    Out of scope

    • Contract workers supplied by labour contractors (noted as a limitation and suggestion for further study).
    • A legal compliance audit — the checklist identifies gaps for discussion, not violations.
    • Salary data of individual employees.
    • Comparisons with other firms.
  5. 2 min

    Methodology

    Research design

    A descriptive and correlational design using a structured questionnaire, with a supplementary welfare facilities checklist.

    Universe and sampling

    • Universe: about 120 employees across production, quality, maintenance, stores and administration.
    • Sampling: census of all willing employees; the target is at least 100 completed questionnaires.

    Tools

    SectionToolDetails
    APersonal dataage, gender, native district/state, education, department, shift, experience, marital status
    BUWES-9 (Schaufeli, Bakker & Salanova, 2006)9 items, 0–6 frequency scale; vigour, dedication, absorption
    CTIS-6 (Bothma & Roodt, 2013)6 items, 5-point; higher = stronger intention to leave
    DPerceived welfare and supervisor support10 researcher-developed items, 5-point Likert, content-validated by two HR faculty and the HR manager
    EOpen questionsone thing to change; one reason to stay
    —Welfare checklistfacilities such as drinking water, washrooms, canteen, restroom, first aid, safety equipment, crèche, welfare officer — marked available/partial/not available with observation notes

    Procedure

    Guide-approved synopsis → written management permission → briefing of supervisors and workers' representatives → pilot with 10 employees → administration in batches during breaks in a training room, with assistance for employees who prefer the questionnaire read out in Kannada, Hindi or Tamil → sealed-box collection → welfare checklist walk-through with the HR manager.

    Analysis (SPSS)

    Descriptives and Cronbach's alpha; t-test by shift (general vs rotating); one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc by department and experience; Pearson correlations; multiple regression with TIS-6 as the dependent variable and engagement, welfare and supervisor support as predictors; content analysis of open responses.

    Timeline (16 weeks)

    WeeksActivity
    1–3Review, synopsis, management permission
    4–5Questionnaire translation, validation of Section D, pilot
    6–8Data collection, welfare checklist
    9–11Data entry and analysis
    12–15Writing, guide corrections, action plan discussion with HR
    16Submission and viva preparation
  6. 1 min

    Architecture & tech stack

    • Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9)
    • Turnover Intention Scale (TIS-6)
    • Labour welfare facilities checklist (Factories Act 1948 / OSH Code 2020)
    • Structured questionnaire (English and Kannada)
    • IBM SPSS Statistics
    • MS Excel
    • APA 7th edition referencing

    The study design links employee-level measures and an organisation-level welfare review to an action plan. Use this flowchart in the Methodology chapter.

    flowchart TD
      A["Review: engagement, turnover, labour welfare"] --> B["Synopsis and hypotheses"]
      B --> C["Management permission and briefing"]
      C --> D["Pilot, n = 10"]
      D --> E["Census of willing employees, target 100+"]
      E --> F["Questionnaire: profile, UWES-9, TIS-6, welfare and supervisor items"]
      C --> G["Welfare checklist with HR manager"]
      F --> H["SPSS: descriptives, reliability"]
      H --> I["t-test, ANOVA, correlation"]
      I --> J["Multiple regression on turnover intention"]
      G --> K[Welfare gap table]
      J --> L[Findings]
      K --> L
      L --> M["Retention and welfare action plan"]

    Conceptual model

    flowchart LR
      E["Work engagement (UWES-9)"] --> T["Turnover intention (TIS-6)"]
      W[Perceived welfare] --> T
      S[Supervisor support] --> T
      W --> E
      S --> E

    The model draws on the Job Demands–Resources model: welfare facilities and supervisor support are job resources that foster engagement, and engagement in turn reduces the wish to leave. The regression tests the direct paths to turnover intention; the arrows from resources to engagement are examined through correlation and suggested for a mediation analysis in future work.

    Confidentiality design

    Questionnaires are anonymous, collected in a sealed box, and results are shared with management only at the department level where a group has at least ten respondents, so no individual can be identified.

  7. 5 modules

    Modules

    • Synopsis and Organisational Entry

      Prepare the synopsis with the guide, obtain written permission from the firm's management, brief supervisors and workers' representatives on purpose and confidentiality, and agree on data-collection times that do not disturb production.

    • Questionnaire Development and Pilot

      Assemble UWES-9, TIS-6 and the researcher-developed welfare and supervisor items, have Section D content-validated by experts, translate into Kannada and Hindi with back-translation, and pilot with ten employees.

    • Data Collection and Welfare Checklist

      Administer questionnaires in batches during breaks with a sealed collection box, assist employees who prefer oral administration, and complete the welfare checklist with the HR manager through an observed walk-through of the plant.

    • Analysis in SPSS

      Code and enter data with value labels, compute reliability and scale scores, run t-tests, ANOVA with post hoc tests, correlations and multiple regression, and content-analyse open responses into themes with frequencies.

    • Action Plan and Report

      Translate findings into a retention and welfare action plan with owners and timelines, discuss it with the HR manager, and write the dissertation with tables, figures, suggestions and annexures for evaluation.

  8. Locked

    Presentation

    12 slides with speaker notes. The outline below is free; the bullets, notes and the generated .pptx unlock with the project.

    1. Employee Engagement and Intention to Stay in an Auto-Component SME
    2. Context
    3. Key Concepts
    4. Review and Gap
    5. Objectives and Hypotheses
    6. Methodology
    7. Employee Profile
    8. Engagement and Turnover Intention
    9. Predictors of Turnover Intention
    10. Welfare Facilities Review
    11. Action Plan
    12. Limitations and Conclusion

    Bullets, speaker notes and the .pptx download unlock with the project.

    Presentation is locked: 12 slides, Speaker notes, .pptx download.

  9. Locked

    How to run

    A research, analysis or design project, so there's no code bundle: 1 step to carry it out with Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9), Turnover Intention Scale (TIS-6) and Labour welfare facilities checklist (Factories Act 1948 / OSH Code 2020).

    The good part is behind this lock. Like every good viva answer.

    How to run is locked: 1 step.

  10. 1 min

    Future scope

    • Actual turnover follow-up after twelve months to test whether intention predicted exits.
    • Mediation analysis testing whether engagement mediates the effect of welfare and supervisor support on turnover intention.
    • Contract-worker study comparing welfare access and engagement with permanent employees.
    • Multi-firm study across several SMEs in Peenya or Bommasandra industrial areas.
    • Intervention — supervisor training on recognition and communication, evaluated with pre–post engagement scores.
  11. 7 sources

    References

    1. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716.
    2. Bothma, C. F. C., & Roodt, G. (2013). The validation of the turnover intention scale. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(1).
    3. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands–Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328.
    4. The Factories Act, 1948 — India Code
    5. The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 — Ministry of Labour and Employment
    6. Mamoria, C. B., & Gankar, S. V. Personnel Management: Text and Cases. Himalaya Publishing House.
    7. Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, 5th ed. SAGE.

    Cite this bundle

    OnlyProjects. (2026). Employee Engagement and Intention to Stay in a 120-Employee Auto-Component SME, Peenya Industrial Area (SPSS): MSW HR & Labour Welfare project bundle [Educational resource]. https://onlyprojects.online/projects/msw-hr-labour-employee-engagement-intention-to-stay-peenya-sme

Slides, diagrams & files

12 slides. Titles are free; bullets, speaker notes and the .pptx unlock with the project.

  1. SLIDE 1

    Employee Engagement and Intention to Stay in an Auto-Component SME

  2. SLIDE 2

    Context

  3. SLIDE 3

    Key Concepts

  4. SLIDE 4

    Review and Gap

  5. SLIDE 5

    Objectives and Hypotheses

  6. SLIDE 6

    Methodology

  7. SLIDE 7

    Employee Profile

  8. SLIDE 8

    Engagement and Turnover Intention

  9. SLIDE 9

    Predictors of Turnover Intention

  10. SLIDE 10

    Welfare Facilities Review

  11. SLIDE 11

    Action Plan

  12. SLIDE 12

    Limitations and Conclusion

Architecture diagrams · 2

1
flowchart TD
  A["Review: engagement, turnover, labour welfare"] --> B["Synopsis and hypotheses"]
  B --> C["Management permission and briefing"]
  C --> D["Pilot, n = 10"]
  D --> E["Census of willing employees, target 100+"]
  E --> F["Questionnaire: profile, UWES-9, TIS-6, welfare and supervisor items"]
  C --> G["Welfare checklist with HR manager"]
  F --> H["SPSS: descriptives, reliability"]
  H --> I["t-test, ANOVA, correlation"]
  I --> J["Multiple regression on turnover intention"]
  G --> K[Welfare gap table]
  J --> L[Findings]
  K --> L
  L --> M["Retention and welfare action plan"]
2
flowchart LR
  E["Work engagement (UWES-9)"] --> T["Turnover intention (TIS-6)"]
  W[Perceived welfare] --> T
  S[Supervisor support] --> T
  W --> E
  S --> E

Files

Viva questions & answers

3 of 14 questions free. Explain each answer in your own words before you move on.

  1. Concept

    What is work engagement according to Schaufeli and Bakker?

    Work engagement is a positive, fulfilling, work-related state of mind characterised by vigour — energy and persistence; dedication — enthusiasm, pride and significance; and absorption — being fully concentrated and happily engrossed in work. UWES-9 measures each dimension with three items.

  2. Concept

    How is engagement different from job satisfaction?

    Job satisfaction is a relatively passive evaluation of whether the job meets one's needs, while engagement is an active, energetic state of involvement in the work itself. An employee can be satisfied with pay and conditions but not engaged, which is why I measured engagement rather than satisfaction.

  3. Concept

    What is the Job Demands–Resources model?

    The JD–R model says every job has demands, such as workload and shift pressure, and resources, such as supervisor support and welfare facilities. Demands drain energy and lead to strain, while resources foster engagement. I used it to justify welfare and supervisor support as predictors of engagement and intention to stay.

+11 more questions

They and the answers unlock with the project. Try answering the ones above yourself first. Your examiner will.

For educational purposes only. Use this bundle to understand how the project works, then build and write your own. Submitting it verbatim is between you, your conscience and your external examiner.