Skip to content

Ward-Level Land-Use / Land-Cover Change 2011–2024 in a Peri-Urban Ward of Mysuru (QGIS + Sentinel-2)

  • 12 slides
  • 15 viva questions
  • 6 modules
  • No code needed

@ward-land-use-change-mysuru-qgisUpdated Oct 2026

A B.Plan thesis that counts how many paddy fields became plotted layouts, one pixel at a time

B.Plan, Urban Planning · Sem 8 (B.Plan) / 4 (M.Plan) · Intermediate · 20 weeks · Solo

More info
Level
Intermediate · 20 weeks · Solo
Relevant for
All India
Common at
ITPI / AICTE model curriculum, School of Planning and Architecture, New Delhi, CEPT University
Syllabus
ITPI ITPI / AICTE model · Planning Thesis (individual; report + drawings + jury) · Semester 8 (B.Plan) / 4 (M.Plan)
Tech stack
  • QGIS
  • Semi-Automatic Classification Plugin (SCP)
  • Landsat 8 / Sentinel-2 imagery
  • Census 2011 Primary Census Abstract
  • Bhuvan (NRSC)
  • Excel / SPSS
  • AutoCAD (base maps)
  • Field survey with GPS app
For educational purposes only

Unlock this project

Full PPT + speaker notes, the step-by-step method, READMEFIRST, instructions and all 15 viva answers.

One-time. No subscription, no auto-renew, no drama.

Project packs

Credits never expire and work on any project. Use one here, save the rest for your friend who “will pay you back”.

  1. Pinned

    1 min

    Overview

    This B.Plan thesis measures how land use and land cover changed between 2011 and 2024 in one peri-urban ward on the edge of Mysuru, Karnataka, and what that change means for the city's next master plan. Mysuru's fringe has been growing along its ring road and main radial roads: agricultural land and tank catchments have turned into plotted layouts, gated enclaves and commercial strips, often faster than roads, drains and schools have followed.

    The study uses freely available Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 imagery for three time points (around 2011, 2017 and 2024), classified in QGIS with the Semi-Automatic Classification Plugin into built-up, agriculture, vegetation, water bodies and open/barren land. Each classified map is checked with ground-truth points collected on field visits and high-resolution imagery, and its accuracy is reported with a confusion matrix, overall accuracy and the kappa coefficient. Change-detection matrices then show exactly which land moved from which class to which.

    Classification results are combined with Census 2011 Primary Census Abstract data for the ward and surrounding villages, Bhuvan thematic layers, and a field survey of roads, drainage and social infrastructure. The thesis ends with planning recommendations for the master-plan revision: land-use zoning corrections, protection of tanks and drainage channels, infrastructure priorities and phasing. Deliverables are a thesis report, a map set and a jury presentation.

    Syllabus alignment

    ITPI · ITPI / AICTE model

    Planning Thesis (individual; report + drawings + jury) · Semester 8 (B.Plan) / 4 (M.Plan)

    Subjects this project applies
    • Planning Studio (area / city plan)
    • Remote Sensing and GIS for Planning (QGIS / ArcGIS)
    • Planning Techniques and Surveys
    • Land-Use Planning and Development Regulations
    • Quantitative Methods (Excel / SPSS)
    • Census and secondary-data analysis
    How it is evaluated

    Team: thesis individual; studios in groups

    1 min read · 15 viva questions

  2. 2 min

    Synopsis

    Abstract

    Peri-urban wards of Indian cities change faster than planning documents can track. Master plans are revised every ten to twenty years, while conversion of farmland into layouts happens every season. This thesis quantifies land-use and land-cover change in a Mysuru fringe ward over thirteen years using satellite imagery and GIS, validates the classification in the field, relates the change to population and infrastructure data, and proposes planning measures for the next master plan.

    Introduction

    The study ward (selected by the student; a fringe ward along a radial road is recommended) includes older village settlements, new private layouts, a lake or tank with its catchment, agricultural land and a highway commercial strip. The ward is small enough to verify on foot and large enough to show clear change.

    Literature review and gap

    Land-use change studies of Indian cities using remote sensing are common at the city or district scale, often with Landsat's 30 m resolution. Fewer studies work at ward level, where planning decisions are actually implemented, and fewer still link classified change to planning recommendations such as zoning corrections and infrastructure phasing. Sentinel-2's 10 m bands make ward-level work more reliable than before. This thesis applies that finer data and connects the results to planning action.

    Existing vs proposed approach

    • Existing: land-use maps in master plans are prepared once per plan period, often from older base maps, and deviations are discovered only when violations are reported.
    • Proposed: a repeatable, low-cost method using open imagery and open-source GIS to measure change at ward level, validate it, and feed it into planning decisions.

    Feasibility

    • Technical: imagery is free from USGS EarthExplorer and the Copernicus programme; QGIS and SCP are open source; a laptop with 8 GB RAM is enough for a ward-size area.
    • Data: Census 2011 ward and village tables are published by the Census of India; Bhuvan provides thematic reference layers.
    • Time: the full workflow fits within one thesis semester with field visits on weekends.
  3. 1 min

    Problem statement

    Peri-urban wards around Mysuru are being converted from agriculture and open land to built-up uses along ring and radial roads. This conversion often happens ahead of planned infrastructure, encroaches on tank beds and storm-water channels, and departs from the proposed land use in the master plan. Planners lack an up-to-date, verified, ward-level picture of how much land has changed, what it changed from, and where, so plan revisions rely on outdated maps and scattered records.

    The problem this thesis addresses is: how much and what kind of land-use and land-cover change has occurred in a selected peri-urban ward of Mysuru between 2011 and 2024, how accurately can it be measured with open satellite data and GIS, and what planning measures should the next master plan adopt in response?

  4. 1 min

    Objectives & scope

    1. 01Prepare land-use/land-cover maps of the study ward for three time points between 2011 and 2024 using Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 imagery.
    2. 02Validate each classification with ground-truth points and report overall accuracy and the kappa coefficient.
    3. 03Produce change-detection matrices and maps showing conversions between classes.
    4. 04Relate land-use change to Census 2011 population data, road network growth and infrastructure availability.
    5. 05Compare observed land use with the proposed land use of the current master plan and identify deviations.
    6. 06Recommend zoning corrections, environmental protection measures and infrastructure priorities for the next plan revision.

    Scope

    In scope

    • One peri-urban ward with a 1 km buffer for context.
    • Five LULC classes: built-up, agriculture, vegetation, water bodies, open/barren land.
    • Three time points (around 2011, 2017, 2024) with accuracy assessment.
    • Census 2011 demographic analysis and a field survey of infrastructure.
    • Planning recommendations at ward level.

    Out of scope

    • Future land-use prediction with cellular automata or machine-learning models (listed as future scope).
    • Legal status of individual layouts or land conversions.
    • Detailed engineering design of infrastructure.
    • Very high-resolution commercial imagery.
  5. 1 min

    Methodology

    The thesis follows a quantitative spatial research design with field validation, over about 20 weeks.

    StageWeeksWorkOutput
    1. Literature & area selection1–3LULC methods, peri-urban literature, master plan study, ward selectionLiterature review, study-area profile
    2. Data acquisition4–5Download cloud-free scenes (post-monsoon/winter), ward boundary, Census tables, Bhuvan layersData inventory
    3. Pre-processing6–7Atmospheric correction (DOS1 in SCP), clipping, band sets, resamplingAnalysis-ready images
    4. Classification8–10Training polygons, supervised classification (maximum likelihood or random forest in SCP)LULC maps ×3
    5. Field validation11–12Stratified random ground-truth points visited with GPS; high-resolution image checks for past yearsAccuracy tables
    6. Change analysis13–14Cross-tabulation, change maps, Census and infrastructure overlayChange matrices and maps
    7. Plan comparison & recommendations15–18Overlay on master-plan land use, deviation mapping, recommendationsProposal maps
    8. Report & jury19–20Report, map set, presentationFinal submission

    Methods: remote sensing and supervised classification, accuracy assessment with confusion matrix and kappa, post-classification change detection, secondary-data analysis of Census tables, field observation and infrastructure survey, and overlay analysis against the master plan.

  6. 1 min

    Architecture & tech stack

    • QGIS
    • Semi-Automatic Classification Plugin (SCP)
    • Landsat 8 / Sentinel-2 imagery
    • Census 2011 Primary Census Abstract
    • Bhuvan (NRSC)
    • Excel / SPSS
    • AutoCAD (base maps)
    • Field survey with GPS app

    Study design as used in the report:

    flowchart TD
      A[Ward boundary + master plan map] --> B[Study area in QGIS]
      C[Landsat 8 / Sentinel-2 scenes: 2011, 2017, 2024] --> D[Pre-processing: DOS1, clip, band set]
      D --> E[Training polygons]
      E --> F[Supervised classification in SCP]
      F --> G[LULC maps x3]
      H[Field ground-truth points with GPS] --> I[Confusion matrix, overall accuracy, kappa]
      G --> I
      I --> J{Accuracy acceptable?}
      J -- no --> E
      J -- yes --> K[Change-detection matrices and maps]
      L[Census 2011 PCA + Bhuvan layers + infra survey] --> M[Overlay and interpretation]
      K --> M
      B --> N[Deviation from master-plan land use]
      M --> N
      N --> O[Planning recommendations]
      O --> P[Report, map set, jury]

    Classification scheme

    ClassIncludes
    Built-uphouses, layouts with roads, commercial, industrial, institutional
    Agriculturecropland, fallow in crop cycle
    Vegetationtree cover, plantations, parks
    Water bodieslakes, tanks, channels with water
    Open/barrencleared plots, quarries, dry tank beds

    Accuracy assessment

    For each date: stratified random sample of reference points per class, confusion matrix, producer's and user's accuracy, overall accuracy and kappa. Past years are checked against archived high-resolution imagery.

  7. 6 modules

    Modules

    • Study Area Profile & Literature

      Selects the ward, maps its boundary and context, summarises its history of growth and the current master plan's proposals, and reviews LULC change methods and peri-urban planning literature.

    • Image Acquisition & Pre-processing

      Downloads cloud-free Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 scenes from comparable seasons, applies atmospheric correction with DOS1 in SCP, clips to the study area and builds band sets for classification.

    • Supervised Classification

      Digitises training polygons for five classes, runs supervised classification in SCP for each date, and cleans the results with majority filtering to remove isolated pixels.

    • Field Validation & Accuracy Assessment

      Visits stratified random ground-truth points with a GPS app, uses archived high-resolution imagery for earlier dates, and reports confusion matrices, producer's and user's accuracy, overall accuracy and kappa.

    • Change Detection & Socio-economic Overlay

      Cross-tabulates classified maps to produce from–to change matrices and maps, and relates them to Census 2011 population, road network growth and infrastructure surveyed in the field.

    • Plan Deviation & Recommendations

      Overlays observed land use on the master plan's proposed land use, maps deviations such as built-up land in tank catchments or agricultural zones, and proposes zoning, protection and infrastructure measures.

  8. Locked

    Presentation

    12 slides with speaker notes. The outline below is free; the bullets, notes and the generated .pptx unlock with the project.

    1. Land-Use Change in a Mysuru Fringe Ward
    2. Need for the study
    3. Aim & objectives
    4. Study area
    5. Data & method
    6. Classification results
    7. Accuracy assessment
    8. Change detection
    9. Population & infrastructure
    10. Plan deviation
    11. Recommendations
    12. Conclusion

    Bullets, speaker notes and the .pptx download unlock with the project.

    Presentation is locked: 12 slides, Speaker notes, .pptx download.

  9. 1 min

    Future scope

    • Predict 2030 land use with a cellular-automata or MOLUSCE-type model and test planning scenarios.
    • Extend the method to all fringe wards to build a city-wide land-use monitoring system.
    • Add night-time lights and building-footprint datasets to refine built-up density.
    • Integrate Census 2027 data when published to update the population analysis.
    • Develop a simple dashboard for the planning authority to track conversions annually.
  10. 9 sources

    References

    1. QGIS User Guide
    2. Semi-Automatic Classification Plugin documentation
    3. USGS EarthExplorer (Landsat data)
    4. Copernicus Data Space Ecosystem (Sentinel-2 data)
    5. Census of India — Primary Census Abstract 2011
    6. Bhuvan — National Remote Sensing Centre, ISRO
    7. Congalton, R. G. and Green, K. — Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices
    8. Lillesand, T., Kiefer, R. and Chipman, J. — Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation
    9. URDPFI Guidelines, 2015 — Town and Country Planning Organisation, MoHUA

    Cite this bundle

    OnlyProjects. (2026). Ward-Level Land-Use / Land-Cover Change 2011–2024 in a Peri-Urban Ward of Mysuru (QGIS + Sentinel-2): B.Plan Urban Planning project bundle [Educational resource]. https://onlyprojects.online/projects/bplan-urban-ward-land-use-change-mysuru-qgis

Slides, diagrams & files

12 slides. Titles are free; bullets, speaker notes and the .pptx unlock with the project.

  1. SLIDE 1

    Land-Use Change in a Mysuru Fringe Ward

  2. SLIDE 2

    Need for the study

  3. SLIDE 3

    Aim & objectives

  4. SLIDE 4

    Study area

  5. SLIDE 5

    Data & method

  6. SLIDE 6

    Classification results

  7. SLIDE 7

    Accuracy assessment

  8. SLIDE 8

    Change detection

  9. SLIDE 9

    Population & infrastructure

  10. SLIDE 10

    Plan deviation

  11. SLIDE 11

    Recommendations

  12. SLIDE 12

    Conclusion

Architecture diagram

1
flowchart TD
  A[Ward boundary + master plan map] --> B[Study area in QGIS]
  C[Landsat 8 / Sentinel-2 scenes: 2011, 2017, 2024] --> D[Pre-processing: DOS1, clip, band set]
  D --> E[Training polygons]
  E --> F[Supervised classification in SCP]
  F --> G[LULC maps x3]
  H[Field ground-truth points with GPS] --> I[Confusion matrix, overall accuracy, kappa]
  G --> I
  I --> J{Accuracy acceptable?}
  J -- no --> E
  J -- yes --> K[Change-detection matrices and maps]
  L[Census 2011 PCA + Bhuvan layers + infra survey] --> M[Overlay and interpretation]
  K --> M
  B --> N[Deviation from master-plan land use]
  M --> N
  N --> O[Planning recommendations]
  O --> P[Report, map set, jury]

Files

Viva questions & answers

3 of 15 questions free. Explain each answer in your own words before you move on.

  1. Concept

    What is the difference between land use and land cover?

    Land cover is the physical material on the ground, such as vegetation, water or built surfaces, which a satellite can see directly. Land use is how people use the land, such as residential or agricultural, which often needs field knowledge. My classes combine both, so field validation matters.

  2. Concept

    What is the kappa coefficient and why do you report it?

    Kappa measures how much better the classification agrees with the reference data than random agreement would. Overall accuracy alone can look high when one class dominates, so kappa gives a fairer picture of classification quality.

  3. Concept

    Why use Sentinel-2 as well as Landsat?

    Sentinel-2 offers 10 m resolution in visible and near-infrared bands compared with Landsat's 30 m, which is important at ward scale where plots and roads are small. Landsat is needed for the 2011 date, before Sentinel-2 was launched.

+12 more questions

They and the answers unlock with the project. Try answering the ones above yourself first. Your examiner will.

For educational purposes only. Use this bundle to understand how the project works, then build and write your own. Submitting it verbatim is between you, your conscience and your external examiner.